MPIA as a Stopgap Measure: Tackling the Stagnation in the WTO Dispute Settlement System

Pawestri Nindyatami, Helsa Yohana Marela Graceyela

Abstract


The paralysis of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Appellate Body (AB) in 2019 created a significant gap in the organization’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM), undermining its ability to enforce fair and timely resolutions for trade disputes. In response, the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) emerged as a temporary, voluntary solution for WTO members seeking an alternative appellate mechanism. This paper explores the structure, processes, and implications of the MPIA, comparing it to the AB system to assess whether it offers a viable, efficient substitute. The study examines how MPIA’s arbitration-based approach and voluntary membership differ from AB’s mandatory, judicial review framework. Findings suggest that while MPIA provides flexibility, timeliness, and procedural efficiency, its limited membership and provisional nature present challenges to achieving consistency in dispute resolution. As WTO members continue to negotiate a path forward for the DSM, the MPIA serves as a testament to multilateral adaptability and highlights the potential role of arbitration in global trade governance. This analysis contributes to the ongoing discourse on WTO reform, emphasizing the need for a durable, balanced mechanism that meets both current efficiency demands and long-term objectives for fairness and consistency in international trade.

Keywords: MPIA; WTO; DSM.

Full Text:


PDF View

References


Ahmed, Mohamed Salah Adawi, Zhang Junxiang, Basel Khaled Alsaeed, and Muhammad Zeeshan Ajmal, ‘MPIA as Solution of Appellate Body Dilemma: An Overview of the Advantages of New Mechanism of WTO Dispute Settlement’, International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 12.05 (2024), 473–96

De Andrade, Mariana, ‘Procedural Innovations in the MPIA: A Way to Strengthen the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism?’, QIL, 63 (2019), 121–49

Choi, Bowon, ‘Three Years of the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement: An Interim Evaluation of Arbitration as a Means to Appeal WTO Panel Reports’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2023

Gao, Henry S., ‘A Rule-Based Solution to the Appellate Body Crisis, and Why the MPIA Would Not Work’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020, 1–18

Hestermeyer, Holger, ‘Saving Appeals in WTO Dispute Settlement: The Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU’, EULaw Live, 2020, 1–4

Hoekman, Bernard, and Charles Sabel, Open Plurilateral Agreements, Global Spillovers and the Multilateral Trading System, Bertelsmann Stiftung, Bertelsmann Stiftung Working Papers, 2020

Hohnstein, Daniel, and Greg Tereposky, ‘Pool of Ten Appeal Arbitrators Established for the WTO Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA)’, Tereposky & DeRose LLP, 2020

Hu, Jiaxiang, and Dapo Wang, ‘To Be or Not to Be? The Implementation of the MPIA from the Perspective of the WTO Dispute Settlement’, China and WTO Review, 7.2 (2021), 239–68

Koesrianti, Mrs., ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: Indonesia’s Perspective in International Trading System’, Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 27.2 (2015), 300–311

Lester, Simon, ‘Can Interim Appeal Arbitration Preserve the WTO Dispute System?’, CATO Institute Free Trade Bulletin, 77, 2020, 1–6

Loo, Guillaume Van der, Getting the WTO’s Dispute Settlement and Negotiating Function Back on Track: Reform Proposals and Recent Developments, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper Series, 2022

Luchene, Marie Van, The MPIA: A Mere Interim Solution or the Pathway to Fixing the WTO?, TTLF Working Papers, 2022

Malkawi, Bashar H., ‘Can Article 25 Arbitration Serve as a Temporary Alternative to WTO Dispute Settlement Process?’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2019

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2017)

———, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2018)

McDougall, Robert, ‘Crisis in the WTO: Restoring the Dispute Settlement Function’, CIGI Papers, 194, 2018, 1–20

Oatley, Thomas H., International Political Economy, 6th edn (New York: London: Routledge, 2019)

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Post 2019: What to Expect?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 22.3 (2019), 297–321

Pauwelyn, Joost, and Krzysztof Pelc, ‘Who Guards the “Guardians of the System”? The Role of the Secretariat in WTO Dispute Settlement’, American Journal of International Law, 116.3 (2022), 534–66

Sacerdoti, Giorgio, Viktoriia Lapa, Diana Wade, and Nazlicicek Semercioglu, ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement System in 2020: Facing the Appellate Body Paralysis’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 3794327, 2021, 1–34

Soejono, and H. Abdurrahman, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2003)

Starshinova, Olga, ‘Is the MPIA a Solution to the WTO Appellate Body Crisis?’, Journal of World Trade, 55.5 (2021), 787–803

‘United States Continues to Block New Appellate Body Members for the World Trade Organization, Risking the Collapse of the Appellate Process’, American Journal of International Law, 113.4 (2019), 822–31

United States Trade Representative, Report on the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization (Washington DC, 2020)

Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Living Without the Appellate Body: Multilateral, Bilateral and Plurilateral Solutions to the WTO Dispute Settlement Crisis’, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 20.6 (2019), 862–90

Wieseler, Anna-Marie, ‘The Appellate Body Deadlock at the WTO: An Analysis of Alternative Ad Hoc Arbitral Tribunals Under Article 25 DSU in Form of the Plurilateral MPIA (2020)—The United States and China’ (University of Twente, 2021)

Wolfe, Robert, Maarja Saluste, Bernard Hoekman, Petros C. Mavroidis, and Matteo Fiorini, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and the Appellate Body Crisis: Insider Perceptions and Members’ Revealed Preferences’, VoxEU, 2019

World Trade Organization, ‘Dispute Settlement without Recourse to Panels and the Appellate Body’, World Trade Organization, 2022

———, ‘Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU’, 2020, pp. 1–7

———, ‘World Trade Organization, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization’, World Trade Organization, 20204




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.slr.2025.7.1.16098

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 26 times
PDF - 30 times

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 26 times
PDF - 30 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


      SOEDIRMAN LAW REVIEW indexed by :

       

 

Redaksi Soedirman Law Review
Gedung Yustisia 1
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Jl. Prof. H.R. Boenyamin No. 708 Grendeng, Purwokerto Utara, Banyumas, Telp. 0281 - 638339
E-mail : soedirmanlawreview@gmail.com

     

     Jurnal Soedirman Law Review by Fakulty of Law, Jenderal Soedirman University is licensed under Attribution 4.0 International