Safe Houses as Instruments of Witness and Victim Protection: Effectiveness and Implementation Challenges
Abstract
Witness and victim protection constitutes a fundamental pillar of a fair and effective criminal justice system, particularly in contexts where intimidation, retaliation, and psychological pressure threaten the integrity of legal proceedings. In Indonesia, the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban - LPSK) implements safe houses as a form of physical and non-physical protection, yet questions remain regarding their practical effectiveness and sustainability. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of safe houses in protecting witnesses and victims and to identify the principal challenges faced by LPSK in implementing this protection mechanism. The research adopts a socio-legal methodology with an empirical juridical approach, combining qualitative interviews, indirect observation, and document analysis of relevant legislation and institutional reports. The findings demonstrate that LPSK safe houses are generally effective in fulfilling their protective objectives, particularly through strict security standards, confidentiality, legal assistance, and psychological and psychosocial support. However, the study also reveals significant implementation challenges, especially related to institutional workload, budget constraints, and cultural tensions arising from restrictive security measures such as limitations on personal communication devices. These restrictions, while legally justified, often negatively affect the psychological well-being and compliance of protected individuals and in some cases lead to early termination of protection. In conclusion, safe houses remain a vital instrument in witness and victim protection in Indonesia, but their effectiveness depends on balancing security imperatives with psychosocial needs. This study recommends adaptive protection policies and more innovative institutional strategies to enhance long-term effectiveness without compromising security.
Keywords: Effectiveness; Safe Houses; Witness and Victim Protection.Full Text:
PDF View
References
Ab. Halim, Mustafa ‘Afifi, and Shabrina Zata Amni, ‘Legal System in the Perspectives of H.L.A Hart and Lawrence M. Friedman’, Peradaban Journal of Law and Society, 2.1 (2023), 51–61
Ahmadin, Ahmadin, Jana Sujana, Karmila Karmila, Didimus Migu, Jhon Stephen Laoemuri, and Rinaldi Agusta Fahlevie, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak Oleh Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban (LPSK)’, Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 3.2 (2024), 49–57
Al-Fayed, Muhammad, Kaila Lutfia Bustamin, Sarinah Sarinah, Sri Nurafifah, and Sri Wahyu Nengsi, ‘Penerapan Gratitude Journal Untuk Meningkatkan Kebersyukuran ABH Di Rumah Aman UPTD PPA Kota Makassar’, PENGABDI, 2.2 (2021), 223–32
Angkasa, Angkasa, Viktimologi (Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020)
Angkasa, Angkasa, Rili Windiasih, and Ogiandhafiz Juanda, ‘Efektivitas Rancangan Undang-Undang Penghapusan Kekerasan Seksual Sebagai Hukum Positif Dalam Perspektif Viktimologi’, Jurnal Usm Law Review, 4.1 (2021), 117–45
Ashady, Suheflihusnaini, and Abd Hasan, ‘Kebijakan Rumah Aman Bagi Anak Korban Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga’, Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 2.1 (2021), 39–54
Badan Pusat Statistik, ‘Statistik Kriminal 2024’, BPS, 2024
Lantz, Brendan, and Marin R. Wenger, ‘Anti-Asian Xenophobia, Hate Crime Victimization, and Fear of Victimization During the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38.1–2 (2023), NP1088–1116
Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (LPSK), Laporan Tahunan 2023: Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban Dalam Pusaran Kejahatan Digital, 2023
———, ‘Safe House’, LPSK, 2021
Nararya, Ananda, ‘Laporan Tahunan LPSK Tahun 2024’, LPSK, 2025
Ramadhan, Ardito, and Krisiandi Krisiandi, ‘LPSK Terima 3.027 Aduan Pada 2021, Terbanyak Sepanjang 13 Tahun Berdiri’, Kompas.Com, 2022
Riyadi, Christianto, and Yohanes Ferry Cahaya, ‘The Effect of Budget Allocation and Budget Realization on The Performance of The Inspectorate of General Supervision (Itwasum) of The Indonesian National Police (Polri)’, Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 6.4 (2025), 1056–62
Soekanto, Soerjono, Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007)
Stanciu, V. V, ‘Victim-Producing Civilizations and Situtations’, in Victim and Society Part I (Washington DC: Visage.Inc, 1976)
Tielung, Frangky, Nurliah Nurdin, and Neneng Sri, ‘Collaborative Governance Penanganan Bagi Korban Kekerasan Perempuan Dan Anak Melalui Rumah Aman Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan Dan Perlindungan Anak’, Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah, 15.2 (2023), 250–64
Yudho, Winarno, and Heri Tjandrasari, ‘The Effectiveness of Law in Society’, Journal of Law and Development, 17.1 (2017)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.slr.2025.7.4.16128
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 9 timesPDF - 2 times
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 9 timesPDF - 2 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
SOEDIRMAN LAW REVIEW indexed by :
 | Redaksi Soedirman Law Review |
Jurnal Soedirman Law Review by Fakulty of Law, Jenderal Soedirman University is licensed under Attribution 4.0 International
